(Gole Haribol deowāi bartamān tathākathita bhakti-samājer neśā)
Date—14.05.2026
Nirviśeṣa (nirviśeṣavādī) Rāmacandra Purī was more interested to rectify others than to rectify himself. Those nirviśeṣavādīs, they in course of doing vaiṣṇava-nindā, gradually become so dangerous demons, that ultimately, they lose their balance of conduct about what to do and what not to do. But a Vaiṣṇava never thinks that way. A Vaiṣṇava only writing for the teachings of his own mind. Śrī Rūpa, Raghunātha, Ṭhākura Bhakti Vinoda, Śrīla Prabhupāda—they all wanted to follow the same idealism to chastise their disciples, but they never expressed any audacity to chastise those Vaiṣṇavas. Śrīmān Mahāprabhu wanted to chastise Choṭa Haridāsa for the teachings of us all. Śrī Paramānanda Prabhu or Śrī Svarūpa Dāmodara never shown such audacity. Those nirviśeṣavādīs, they want to become guru of those Vaiṣṇavas, whereas those Vaiṣṇavas, they always want to become disciple of Vaiṣṇava. Śrī Rāmānujācārya saying that— “Bhaktāṅghri-reṇu is my nitya-siddha Gurudeva. Dust particle from his lotus feet is my life and soul.” Ācārya Śrī Viṣṇu Svāmī saying that— “Śrī Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura is my absolute Gurupādapadma.” That heartless personality, who out of his ferocious envious mood criticizes the ever-stainless character of Śrī Gurupādapadma, those passengers of Naraka, their useless wrong siddhānta-vicāras should never be heard.
We need to grow more and more unalloyed faith unto the lotus feet of Śrī Gurupādapadma by being unmindful to their heartlessness. Śrīla Prabhupāda used to say that— “Devotees are so great that they can make urine on those hundreds of so-called documents represented by those sahajiyās to make crores of oceans. Those false documents can be floated into the deep ocean by taking shelter of the lotus feet of Guru-Vaiṣṇavas which can be compared with a compact boat to cross over the ocean of Māyā. So the way shown by those previous ācāryas is to be worshipped.”
Those critics can never get maṅgala, what to speak about vaiṣṇava-nindās, which is far away from that?
Better I can stay as a servant of Jagāi–Mādhāi. But still I never like to become the crown of those materialistic people to support their good principles, those yoṣit-saṅgīs dressed up in a good uniform to project their so-called idealism—those who are nirviśeṣavādīs. There is such a prominent difference between prākṛta sahajiyā and śuddha vaiṣṇava siddhānta that those prākṛta sahajiyās supporting those above mentioned characterlessness to establish those factors as bhagavad-bhakti, and whereas the vicāra of those śuddha Vaiṣṇavas is that—Vaiṣṇavas are always flawless.